Personal tools
You are here: Home Research Application and System Performance Dynamic Adaption and Steering
Document Actions

Dynamic Adaption and Steering

by admin last modified 2004-10-15 12:38

Application Mapping, Dynamic Adaptation and Steering

As computer systems grow in size and complexity, tool support is needed to facilitate the efficient mapping of large-scale applications onto these systems. Today, most applications are mapped to a set of resources at program launch and then run to completion using these resources. However, large-scale systems built from commodity components are prone to failure and long-running applications for such systems must sense and respond to component failure.

Intelligent mapping and performance steering offer an opportunity to adjust a running program for more efficient execution and to adapt to changing resource availability (e.g., due to component failures or resource sharing). A challenge is to develop strategies that enable applications running on ASC-scale systems to monitor their own behavior and reactively adjust their behavior to optimize performance according to one or more metrics. For this purpose, performance analysis tools must provide robust performance observation capabilities at all levels of the system and the ability to map low-level behavior to high-level program constructs. Our goal is to develop tools and approaches that can help applications achieve high performance even when system components fail or applications are subject to other system constraints – managing the challenge of large scale and integration with multiple subsystems.  This work will explicitly target the LANL Clustermatic infrastructure.

Our goal is to develop tools and approaches that can help applications achieve high performance even when system components fail or applications are subject to other system constraints.  Strategies for automatic performance steering based on performance and fault models offer the potential to enable long-running programs to repeatedly adjust themselves to changes in the execution environment – perhaps to opportunistically acquire more resources as they become available, to rebalance load, or adapt to component failures.  Moreover, measurement of environmental conditions on nodes promises to allow users and schedulers to balance checkpoint frequency and partition allocation based on failure likelihood.

In addition, validated performance “contracts” among applications, systems, and users that combine temporal and behavioral reasoning from performance predictions, previous executions, and compile-time analyses are one promising approach. This work continues to explore the use of performance contracts to guide the monitoring of application and resource behavior; contracts will include dynamic performance signatures and techniques for locally (per process) and globally (per application and per system) evaluating observed behavior relative to that expected.

« October 2010 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
 

Powered by Plone

LACSI Collaborators include:

Rice University LANL UH UNM UIUC UNC UTK